本篇最後由 S.O.H 於 2025-7-10 17:55 編輯
第一階:觀點
https://www.jkforum.net/thread-19786732-1-1.html
第二階:線性投射
https://www.jkforum.net/thread-19863241-1-1.html
第三階:周延
https://www.jkforum.net/thread-19875542-1-1.html
第四階:具象體現
https://www.jkforum.net/thread-20110973-1-1.html
現在,是過去的未來
仰望星空,所見均是星系的過往態樣,部分或許已逝
換句話說,空間/距離愈大,人類對所接收到的訊息誤判愈高
儘管歷史總是相似,卻不一定相近,更遑論符合預期
除非,能做到即時傳送:
「現代的即時通訊,對過往的電報系統而言,宛如先知」
人們能夠感知的,是自身/對象的狀態(現在)與歷程(過去)
現下的處境,是過往的積累,屬於既定事實,理論上不可逆
然而,理論並非原則,仍有精進空間
所謂事實,會隨人的主觀意識而有不同的解釋
這樣的論述,不僅指稱「其他人」,還適用於自己
至此,人類即便無法回到過去,卻能藉由回顧,再次審視已發生的事實:
「只要重塑對事物的認知與定義,等同回到過去改變事件,影響現在與未來」
未來,尚未決定
人類有能力選擇是何幅景象,關鍵是:意願
馬斯洛的需求層次理論雖嚴謹,卻無法解釋人性的反蝕現象
1.為何人會安於現狀,不願跨越舒適圈?
2.生存(生理、安全)的條件不足,為何人會盲目追求自尊與自我實現!
人性是多重意識的綜合體,賦予其特定趨向等同自詡為上帝,自大且無知
有動機不見得會訴諸行動,須考量環境阻力產生的折損率
同樣的情境,有人愈挫愈勇、有人畏虎怕難,故折損率應假定為-100%~100%
這說明反蝕現象1.,停滯的原因僅是環境阻力>動機,否決滿足更高需求的意願
相對的,不同需求層次的環境阻力(主/客觀)也不同,致使人越級挑戰
這證明反蝕現象2.,自尊與自我實現屬於「意識形態」的滿足,只要自定義認可(阻力趨近於0),即使客觀條件(生活水準)不如預期,仍可寄存於假想的舒適圈
實質的積累,才有意義,更是當責
不論過往如何,當下的決斷才是首要
儘管未來不可知,卻是每個現下堆砌的結果
因受阻而停滯,因滿足而寄存,均符合個人意願
沒有不好,但有差異;也因差異,造就階級
人終將為自己的選擇付出代價,不是一句「非我本意」就能開脫
Present is the future of the past.
Looking up at the stars, what we see are the past states of the galaxies, some of which may have passed away.
In other words, the greater the space/distance, the higher the misjudgment of the information received by humans.
Although history is always similar, it is not necessarily close, let alone in line with expectations.
Unless it can be transmitted instantly:
"Modern instant communication is like a prophet to the past telegraph system."
What people can perceive is the state (present) and processes (past) of themselves/the others.
The current situation is the accumulation of the past, which is a given fact and theoretically irreversible.
However, theory is not a principle and there is still room for improvement.
The so-called facts will be interpreted differently according to people's subjective consciousness.
Such a statement not only refers to "other people", but also applies to oneself.
So far, even if humans cannot go back to the past, they can review and re-examine the facts that have happened:
"As long as we reshape our cognition and definition of things, it is equivalent to going back to the past to change events and affect the present and the future."
The future is yet to be determined.
Humans have the ability to choose what kind of scene it will be, the key is: willingness.
Although Maslow's hierarchy of needs theory is rigorous, it cannot explain the phenomenon of human nature's erosion.
1. Why are people content with the status quo and unwilling to cross the comfort zone?
2. Insufficient conditions for survival (physiology, safety), why do people blindly pursue self-esteem and self-realization!
Human nature is a complex of multiple consciousnesses. Giving it a specific tendency is equivalent to claim to be God, arrogant and ignorant.
Motivation does not necessarily lead to action, and the depreciation rate caused by environmental resistance must be considered.
In the same situation, some people become more courageous after setbacks, while others are afraid of difficulties, so the depreciation rate should be assumed to be -100%~100%.
This shows the reverse erosion phenomenon 1. The reason of the stagnation is that the environmental resistance is greater than the motivation, which denies the willingness to meet higher needs.
Relatively speaking, the environmental resistance (subjective/objective) of different demand levels is also different, causing people to challenge higher levels.
This proves the reverse erosion phenomenon 2. Self-esteem and self-realization belong to the satisfaction of "ideology". As long as the self-defined recognition (resistance is close to 0), even if the objective conditions (living standards) are not as expected, people can still live in the imaginary comfort zone.
Substantial accumulation is meaningful and responsible.
No matter what happened in the past, the current decision is the most important.
Although the future is unknown, it is the result of every present accumulation.
Stagnation due to obstruction and living with satisfaction are all in line with personal wishes.
Nothing is bad, but there are differences; and because of the differences, hierarchy is created.
People will eventually pay the price for their choices, and it cannot be excused by saying "it was not my original intention". |